Pubdate: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 Source: Bulletin, The (Bend, OR) Copyright: 2014 Western Communications Inc. Contact: http://www.bendbulletin.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/62 Author: Jonathan Poisner Note: Jonathan Poisner was a member of the City Club of Portland's research committee that investigated Measure 91. He lives in Portland. END OREGON'S PROHIBITION OF MARIJUANA Oregon has about 80 years of experience with the failed policy of marijuana prohibition. The results are clear: Treating marijuana as a crime has failed. Washington and Colorado legalized marijuana in 2012. Oregon and Alaska are voting on it right now. Measure 91, which would regulate, tax and legalize marijuana for adults 21 and older, deserves Oregonians' votes. A City Club of Portland member-volunteer research committee spent four months studying Measure 91. We interviewed experts from a variety of fields, including law enforcement, public health, and taxation, reviewed dozens of studies and articles, and weighed the pros and cons of legalization. The majority concluded that this measure is well written, comprehensive and could be implemented successfully. In 2010, Oregon's state and local governments spent over $50,000,000 enforcing marijuana possession laws, with nearly 10,000 combined marijuana-related citations and arrests. The marijuana-related numbers for 2012 were even higher, with roughly 13,000 citations and arrests. Imagine if that time, energy, and money were being spent on more dangerous crimes and more lethal drugs, instead of being used to combat use of a substance that is less addictive than alcohol or tobacco. Disturbingly, current marijuana laws are enforced in a way that disproportionately harms minorities. Despite studies showing people of color do not use marijuana at higher rates, they are more than twice as likely as whites to be arrested for marijuana in Oregon. If marijuana were regulated and legal, the failed policy of marijuana prohibition would be ended. Police could focus on more important issues, like solving violent crimes. There is a high probability that the state would see a reduction in other crimes related to illegal drug sales as marijuana moves into the legitimate marketplace. There are also economic reasons for legalization. The experts that we interviewed pointed to the economic benefits of legal businesses and jobs in marijuana cultivation, transportation, wholesale, and retail. While not all of these jobs will be new, bringing black market jobs into the legal marketplace decriminalizes them and makes them subject to laws regarding workplace safety, Social Security, income tax withholding, and legal protections for workers. After paying for the costs of regulating marijuana, new state revenue from taxing marijuana producers will go to important services, including Oregon's Common School Fund, mental health treatment for alcohol and drug abuse, the Oregon Health Authority for drug abuse prevention, the State Police, and Oregon's cities and counties for law enforcement. Some of the revenue gained from taxing marijuana will go to drug prevention education for youth, which evidence shows can be effective in reducing youth consumption. The only question, then, is whether Measure 91 is the right vehicle. Based on our research, our Committee felt the answer is yes. The Oregon Liquor Control Commission would receive broad authority to regulate marijuana production, processing and sales. Existing laws prohibiting marijuana use by minors would remain in effect. Oregon's medical marijuana system would not be affected. Cities and counties, meanwhile, could adopt regulations to limit where sales take place, just as they limit the locations of bars. They could even opt out of allowing marijuana shops and commercial production through a local ballot measure, although those who do so would also opt out of receiving their share of the tax revenue. If problems arise, the Legislature can address them because Measure 91 is not a Constitutional amendment. Oregon lawmakers have had ample opportunity to pass or refer a legalization measure, but they have not. Oregonians will have to do it themselves and Measure 91 is a well-crafted means to that end. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom