Pubdate: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 Source: Exponent, The (IN Edu) Copyright: 2006 Purdue Exponent Contact: http://www.purdueexponent.org/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/883 Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n000/a089.html Author: Marilyn Morrison DRUG POLICY DISCRIMINATES AGAINST CERTAIN STUDENTS In an editorial posted on March 30 entitled "Groups sue for financial aid for drug offenders," the Exponent claimed that the American Civil Liberties Union and Students for Sensible Drug Policy are wrong to challenge the constitutionality of the Higher Education Act. One provision of the Higher Education Act denies financial aid to college students convicted of a drug offense. As the president of the Purdue ACLU, I must point out that the empty conclusions by the Exponent were not supported by the law or the U.S. Constitution. The ACLU and Students for Sensible Drug Policy lawsuit maintains that the Higher Education Act violates the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment which reads, "nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb." This protects citizens not only from being tried twice for the same offense, but also from being punished twice for the same offense. Eliminating a student from eligibility for financial aid because of a drug conviction for which they were already punished violates this protection. The ACLU and Students for Sensible Drug Policy lawsuit also maintains that the Higher Education Act violates the equal protection clause of the Fifth Amendment which states, "nor shall any person be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." This protects against laws that discriminate against groups of people. The Higher Education Act classifies convicted drug offenders as ineligible for financial aid, violating this protection. The ACLU's mission is to protect our rights. One way to accomplish this is to challenge legislation that erodes these rights. We can debate whether convicted drug offenders deserve financial aid, as the Exponent suggests, but this would miss the point. The Higher Education Act threatens rights guaranteed by the Constitution, and I applaud the challenge to this provision of the Higher Education Act by ACLU and Students for Sensible Drug Policy. Marilyn Morrison Junior, College of Science - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake