Pubdate: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 Source: Alliston Herald (CN ON) Copyright: 2005 Metroland Printing, Publishing and Distributing Contact: http://www.simcoe.com/sc/alliston/contact/v-scv3/ Website: http://www.simcoe.com/sc/alliston/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/2224 Author: George Kosinski Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/hr.htm (Harm Reduction) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mjcn.htm (Cannabis - Canada) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/meth.htm (Methamphetamine) THE BEST WAY TO BE RID OF DRUGS IS WITH LAW There are some serious problems with MPP Garfield Dunlop's analysis (Herald Weekend Aug. 26) perhaps originating from the fact community safety and correctional services often have conflicting goals; thus, being party critic for both may prove problematic. Mr. Dunlop's complaints are essentially irrelevant, as the most effective way to eliminate illegal drug production facilities is by bringing all drug production under the rubric of legal, regulated procedures. This is not to say that crystal meth should be legally available, but if milder forms of amphetamines, which were legal in the past, were legally available today, there would most likely be far less interest in crystal meth. Perhaps even so little interest as to be financially unrewarding for the black market. OPPA President Brian Adkin's assertion that "targeted drug enforcement is the most effective and proven method to disrupt this activity and those profiting from these means" is absurd nonsense. It is contra-indicated not only by the fact illegal drugs are more readily available than ever before, but also by the repeal of alcohol prohibition. Prohibition's repeal wiped out the involvement of criminal organizations in the production and distribution of alcohol -- and the associated violence -- and did so overnight. I should add tangentially that Mr. Adkin, who is certainly not alone in this regard, is clearly unable to distinguish between the effects of drugs and the effects of drug prohibition. There is no violence related to marijuana production, while there is indeed substantial violence related to marijuana prohibition. How could it be otherwise, when those who wish to commit violent thefts from marijuana wholesalers and retailers have the confidence of knowing their victims won't be going to the police to lay charges? Civilians suffer in every war, and the war on some drugs is no exception. The correctional services industry (actually, the law enforcement industry in general) benefits from marijuana prohibition. Community safety benefits from marijuana legalization which, among other things, would move marijuana farming to the fields where it belongs. Take your pick, but don't pretend you don't have a choice. George Kosinski, Gibsons, B.C. - ---