Pubdate: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 Source: Banner, The (CN ON) Copyright: 2003 The Orangeville Banner Contact: http://www.orangeville.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/2217 Author: R. Jones USERS, DOCTORS, GOVERNMENT PART OF POT DEBATE Dear Editor, I'm writing in response to the article Grow houses a rising concern and the editorial A growing concern (The Banner, Nov. 18). Missing from both your reporting and your editorial position is a fair look at why grow houses exist. The Banner has focused its journalism on the only party which makes an income from the drug-trade/drug-war besides organized criminals -- the police. There are many voices in the marijuana debate; police and criminals are just the loudest and most dangerous. The debate should instead be focused on the real stakeholders: users (both medical and recreational), their caregivers, the government (which decides what is criminal, what is not, and what regulations are appropriate), and the scientific research community. All other voices are biased by money, misinformation and "reefer madness." Like the debate over gay marriage, this is a decision that cannot be left to the majority, at the expense of the rights of the minority (in this case, the cannabis user). Most good citizens will agree that grow houses are bad, dangerous, and criminal. If cannabis was legal and regulated, no one would have any reason to damage houses, steal hydro, booby-trap entrances, etc. What would be the point? Anyone can grow it in a garden, window-box, or even in a pot in the balcony window. Done properly, a grow operation can be built-to-code, safety inspected, and optimized for space and conditions. Alternately, users could get it at a designated retailer -- this is simply a question of regulation. Our federal government has made medical marijuana available to a very select few, and allowed others to grow their own, legally, under license from the Ministry of Health. Bill C-38 (likely to die with Prime Minister Jean Chretien's departure) was to decriminalize possession of personal quantities and limited personal gardens. Our Canadian senate, after studying learned legal and scientific opinion and testimony from all interested parties, has recommended full legalization and regulation. Consistent, but opposing messages from police chiefs (pro-decriminalization and concerned with keeping the peace) and from police unions (pro drug-war and concerned with keeping their jobs) are biased -- the former by real world experience and public trust and expectations, the latter by personal employment potential. Which bias should we trust? The debate over legal marijuana is a very hot topic, and we must be rational and intelligent in our analysis, not rash and ignorant. Until harm can be proven -- real harm, not more propaganda -- marijuana is being unfairly prohibited to preserve police budgets, which are better spent on real, not contrived crime. OPP Det. Sgt. Jamie Ciotka is very mistaken when he states, "There are a few common factors that grow houses need to be profitable." There is only one factor: prohibition. End prohibition and regulate legal sales and you will end the dangerous, criminal grow house epidemic. Instead of encouraging Dufferin County residents to spy and report on suspicious neighbours, The Banner should be outraged at this ongoing waste of resources. If The Banner's editorial board supports prohibition, it supports organized crime, plain and simple. R. Jones, Mulmur Township - --- MAP posted-by: Larry Stevens