Pubdate: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 Source: Metrowest Daily News (MA) Website: http://www.metrowestdailynews.com/ Feedback: http://www.hiasys.com/contactus/contactus.html Address: 33 New York Avenue, Framingham, MA 01701 Contact: 2002, MetroWest Daily News and Herald Interactive Advertising Fax: (508)626-4400 Author: Frederick Chase Jr. Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/pot.htm (Cannabis) LEGALIZE MARIJUANA It is ironic that a marijuana (MJ) drug bust receives front page, color photo, top of the fold billing in the same issue (Monday, April 18) as Deroy Murdock's column blasting "This shopworn (drug) policy." I have never drawn a puff on a roach much less inhaled, but I am with Murdock. The front page article is in the category of "so, what else is new?" Obviously, the real news is not being reported and that is how much of this stuff (MJ) is getting through the law enforcement net. Of course, no one knows and the traffickers are not holding press conferences. But with some analysis using at least the law of supply and demand we know the demand for the stuff (MJ) is being met. Over the decades the price has trended down and the strength has trended up. For kids MJ may be more available than alcohol. The pushers aren't checking ID's. Have you heard of anyone pushing alcohol on the street? Although the traffickers and the pushers are not furnishing statistics (or paying sales taxes or taxes on the huge income made) we know from the law of supply and demand that vastly more MJ is getting through to customers than is being confiscated or interdicted. All the laws in the country to the contrary notwithstanding. That is the real news! For decades we have been reading about huge drug busts to reach the goal of a "Drug Free America." That is as likely as reaching a "Murder Free America." Obviously, we are not going to decriminalize murder, but MJ? Give me a break. The country is awash in drugs - illegal and legal. Alcohol does far more damage to the country. Tobacco (nicotine) does far more damage to the country than MJ and alcohol combined. If we want to criminalize a popular drug criminalize tobacco (nicotine) or criminalize alcohol. Of course, we did criminalize alcohol some 70 years ago. It was called Prohibition. As history tells us it did not work too well. But maybe we are smarter now with our modern communications and well trained SWAT teams. Hey, I am kidding. Of course, the politicians have a terrible time with this concept, at least in public, except for a few like past Governor of New Mexico Gary Johnson and a few others. The cry of "Being Soft on Crime" is overwhelming, especially for the Democrats. It is ironic that the Republicans, who pride themselves on small federal government and claim to be against Federal government interference, are perfectly happy to continue this policy that calls for government confiscation of property, a huge prison/industrial complex, increasing welfare needs. Once MJ is decriminalized it is no longer a crime to be soft on. But this action will only come from the grass roots. The politicians will follow. In no way do I denigrate the risks incurred by law enforcement. This is the policy the government has set out. They are to be admired for risk taking. Of course, asset confiscation does provide extra cash and sending a steady flow of arrestees keeps the prison/industrial empire thriving, providing employment for guards, contractors and support activities. And risk is exciting. About a year ago the Wall Street Journal ran an article on the explosion of SWAT teams. Almost every government agency wanted one. And this was before 9-11 and the terrorist threat. Clearly, law enforcement can be taking risks that are much, much more beneficial to the country than pursuing a failed MJ policy. Remember, traffickers and pushers will absolutely not want us to decriminalize MJ. Frederick Chase Jr., Framingham - --- MAP posted-by: Beth