Pubdate: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 Source: Chicago Tribune (IL) Copyright: 2002 Chicago Tribune Company Contact: http://www.chicagotribune.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/82 Author: Louis B. Garippo ADDICTS NEED TREATMENT, NOT PRISON TIME Louis B. Garippo, Board chairman TASC Inc The Chicago Tribune recently published an article about Proposition 36, a treatment diversion program for drug offenders in California ("Jury out on treatment program; Novel anti-drug strategy may be a budget victim," News, July 2). The article identifies California and Arizona as the first states "to take a comprehensive approach in making treatment available to all eligible drug offenders in their states." Thanks to our public policymakers and leaders in our state and local justice systems, however, Illinois has had a system for linking criminal justice with community treatment services for 25 years. Under Illinois law, many non-violent, addicted offenders entering the criminal justice system are eligible for diversion into treatment by way of TASC (Treatment Alternatives for Safe Communities), a non- profit entity with representatives who serve every criminal courthouse in the state. TASC conducts assessments of offenders' clinical needs and refers them to appropriate treatment in the community. Regular communication with all of the parties involved ensures offender accountability. TASC also makes referrals to other social services, such as educational and vocational training, mental health treatment and child welfare services. Through this process, thousands of individuals every year receive treatment instead of prison time on their way to healthy, productive citizenship. Combined with the leverage of criminal sanctions for non- compliance, treatment is a proven alternative for reducing drug use and recidivism. Yet while we have the infrastructure in place to address this issue, two concerns remain. First is a sentencing structure that continues to incarcerate low-level offenders at an overwhelming rate. Drug offenders currently make up 40 percent of new admissions to prison, in part because of sentencing laws that mandate prison for crimes involving relatively small amounts of drugs and that are particularly harsh for repeat offenders. California's Proposition 36 leaves no room for judicial discretion, which is essential in balancing the "carrot" of treatment with the "stick" of criminal justice sanctions and accountability. There is no need to burden taxpayers or our prison system with mandatory incarceration for offenders who would be better served with treatment. Not only is treatment more cost-effective than incarceration, but it also presents much better prospects for long- term abstinence from drug use and criminal behavior. My second concern echoes that expressed in the article--the severe shortage of adequate treatment resources. Simply stated, there are not enough treatment slots available for the sheer volume of non-violent offenders with substance abuse problems. National estimates suggest that 65 percent of inmates would benefit from some form of substance- abuse treatment. In Illinois, that equates to 25,000 people in prison alone, not to mention tens of thousands more on probation and parole. As state budgets tighten and human services get cut, we lose the opportunity to restore these individuals to self-sufficiency and participation in their communities. It should be no surprise that half of all inmates released will return to prison within three years. Their communities simply don't have the resources to support their re- entry. I encourage public policymakers in Illinois to pursue a reframing of our sentencing laws for drug crimes, as well as a commitment to providing adequate treatment resources. For Illinois to continue to lead the nation in designing and implementing cost-effective alternatives to incarceration, we must also be leaders in providing treatment to those who need it. To do otherwise sets up our public systems--and those who seek recovery--for failure. - --- MAP posted-by: Beth