Pubdate: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 Source: Bay Area Reporter (CA) Copyright: 2001 The Bay Area Reporter / B.A.R. Contact: http://www.mapinc.org/media/41 Website: http://www.ebar.com/ Author: Frederick Hobson Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/prop36.htm (Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act) SPEAK UP AT DRUG ABUSE HEARING Californians spoke resoundingly with their votes going to support Proposition 36, the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000, in last November's general election. The 61 percent margin reflects the growing sentiment that addiction is a disease, a medical condition. Here in San Francisco, this sentiment has prevailed for quite some time, witness the medical model approach with which our local health leadership and law enforcement have taken in dealing with the totality of the drug epidemic. This Friday (1-3 p.m.) and Saturday (noon-2 p.m.), April 27 and 28, the San Francisco Drug Abuse Advisory Board's public policy committee will be hosting a town hall meeting at City Hall in the John Taylor Committee Room 263. The meetings will focus on public comment, information, criticism, and suggestions on what the city is doing right, what it needs to change or improve in the treatment programs it funds, how to increase funding (currently less than 1 percent of the city's budget), how to involve the public in the fight against this disease, and what policies should be in place as the city moves forward in recognizing that we face an epidemic where costs both financially and in lives is almost beyond comprehension. Drug abuse affects each and every San Franciscan, if not with someone we love or know, then in our pocketbooks and financial ledgers. While much of the focus is on implementing Proposition 36 in San Francisco -- indeed, plans are being finalized now under the very able leadership of Barbara Garcia of the Department of Public Health and District Attorney Terence Hallinan -- there are more people with addiction disease who are never arrested. The favorable climate for sending those with a conviction or guilty plea to simple possession or use of illegal narcotics into treatment should naturally be complemented with equal fervor by expanding our treatment models to meet the needs of Proposition 36 users and the many, many others with addiction disease who will not be able to access treatment through the proposition. Estimates of San Franciscans who abuse or are addicted to narcotics are within the range of 2 to 10 percent. Many of these are recreational users where the effects of narcotic use have not yet openly been presented or noticed. We are not talking about marijuana, but about drugs such as crack cocaine, heroin, and methamphetamine. Take a walk through the Tenderloin, inner Mission, Haight-Ashbury, or Bayview-Hunter's Point neighborhoods and you will see the ravages of addiction up close. It is not a pretty picture. Everyone in San Francisco has a stake in this. Please come to the meetings. Frederick Hobson, Public Policy Chair San Francisco Drug Abuse Advisory Board - --- MAP posted-by: Doc-Hawk