Pubdate: Sun, 03 Dec 2000
Source: Record, The (CA)
Copyright: 2000 The Record
Contact:  P.O. Box 900, Stockton, CA 95201
Fax: (209) 547-8186
Website: http://www.recordnet.com/
Author: Marlo D'Angeli

CALIFORNIA MUST KEEP DRUG COURTS IN PLACE

It is clear that in recent years, there was a lot wrong with the way that 
California and the nation dealt with the misery of widespread drug abuse. 
It became clear with the passage of Proposition 36 that many Californians 
are aware that the emphasis on penal punishment was part of the problem of 
drug abuse -- not the solution.

However, from all the factual evidence, it is also clear that the system of 
drug courts in California has been a shining light in a dark-and-dreary 
picture. The facts show that drug courts are effective and successful, and 
we need more of them.

Experts in the field know that for many addicts a combination of the 
carrot-and-the-stick/love-and-care approach -- combined with authority -- 
is the only way that positive change can occur.

If Proposition 36 is to succeed, drug courts, as an integral part of the 
Proposition 36 strategy, should be greatly expanded -- not eliminated.

Although some proponents of Proposition 36 oppose drug courts, they lack 
the knowledge and skill to implement and administer the policy and program 
that can achieve their own goals.

They have made a powerful political statement. They should remain watchdogs 
regarding goal achievement. But they must not usurp the role of social 
scientists and therapists who agree with their objectives and who have the 
relevant expertise and responsibility to do the work that obtains results.

The drug court is necessary as the glue that keeps the addict, who would 
otherwise relapse repeatedly, attached to the program -- thus preventing a 
tragic and expensive waste of human and economic resources. Many addicts 
tell you this. Many recovering addicts admit this.

New York has embarked on exactly this approach by integrating the 
Proposition 36 way and the drug court way into a powerful strategy for 
maximum success.

Let us take a closer look at the New York model. Then let us rapidly 
develop our own California model. California political leaders now have the 
opportunity and duty to respond decisively to the voters by steering 
Proposition 36 toward creative public policy.

Let them hear from you. We do not have the time or the money to waste.

Marlo D'Angeli, Stockton
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jo-D